DmitriiBabinovWork with me
PUTIN OUT THE FIRE · web edition

Putin and the FSB State

By mid‑2026, the FSB is no longer the regime’s most powerful instrument - it is the regime’s operating system. This issue traces how that happened and what it means for succession, coercion, and the long arc of Russian power.
№ 011analysisopen‑source dossier

The Federal Security Service has spent two decades absorbing functions that once belonged to the army, the police, the tax service, and the foreign ministry. Since 2024 the pace has accelerated into something closer to institutional redesign than routine bureaucratic drift.

Five separate legislative expansions in early 2026 alone. A renamed academy. A demolished memorial to Soviet repression victims - removed days before the name change. These are not separate events. They are the visible nodes of a single strategy: making the Chekist continuity model the only remaining operating system for Russian state power.

The Dzerzhinsky renaming in April 2026 is not nostalgia. It is a doctrinal signal that the FSB’s lineage now runs unbroken - from the Cheka to the present - and that lineage is being offered as the answer to the succession problem.

Structural Power

The legislative record since 2024 leaves no ambiguity about the trajectory.

The FSB has gained sweeping access to bank transaction data, corporate and telecom databases, internet-service suspension powers, and authority to compile extremist-materials lists without judicial review. Bloomberg’s March 2026 characterization of this as “deepening the state’s reach into economic and social life” understates it: the FSB is consolidating what amounts to an indigenous surveillance stack that does not require foreign technology.

For the Kremlin this is double insurance. First, it insulates the regime against the very social unrest that sanctions and mobilization were supposed to discourage. Second, it makes the FSB leadership structurally indispensable, because the apparatus it commands touches everything: elections, courts, regional governors, defense contractors, and the intelligence services themselves.

The People Who Hold the Keys

Any succession calculus must begin with the people who currently hold institutional levers. Bortnikov, Patrushev, Zolotov, and Naryshkin control institutional levers that could determine whether a handoff succeeds. None is a natural “next Putin,” and all share the same birth decade.

Alexander Bortnikov

FSB director. Runs the “systema” - the informal networks embedded across ministries and companies. Most probable immediate successor in a sudden transition.

Nikolai Patrushev

Security Council secretary. Architect of the hardline security doctrine. Holds ideological capital inside the intelligence community.

Viktor Zolotov

Rosgvardiya chief. Commands the 340,000‑strong National Guard - a Praetorian force loyal to Putin personally.

Succession Scenarios

Three models are worth tracking. A managed transfer - Soviet-style, with the FSB ratifying a designated successor. A caretaker Security Council period, where permanent members collectively govern. And a fragmentation scenario in which competing siloviki clans fight for control of surveillance, force, and finances.

The first two are the Kremlin’s preferred frames; the third is the contingency that Western intelligence assessments treat as both most dangerous and increasingly plausible if the war in Ukraine reaches a prolonged stalemate.

Putin’s own FSB expansion may have created the very institutional weight that limits his freedom of action. The apparatus is becoming self-sustaining and its class too powerful to dismiss. That is the structural problem the Dzerzhinsky symbolism is meant to make coherent.

What Follows

A post‑Putin order is likely to preserve imperial and repressive policy regardless of which figure emerges. The siloviki share doctrine; the FSB’s infrastructure outlasts individuals; the war economy has made the security‑industrial complex the dominant state form. Its internal contradictions will determine how long that structure can be managed before its factions become openly competitive.

Sources